Breadcrumb


Religious Studies Program

The Cal Poly Philosophy Department houses a Religious Studies program with a wide variety of courses in GE and a Religious Studies minor.

Click to visit the website

Between the Species

Between the Species online journal logoAn online philosophy journal about the relationship between humans and animals.
Click to visit the website

Ethics Group


Cal Poly's Ethics + Emerging Sciences Group focuses on the implications and impact of emerging sciences and technologies.
Click to visit the website

Research Workshop: "You Would Do That"

Brian Looper (UCSB Philosophy grad student)

Friday, October 25, 2019 from 12:10 - 2:00 pm in 22-210 (English bldg)


Abstract
Say a wallet with $100.00 has been left behind on a bus and that persons A, B, and C board. And say that A has such a moral character that if he discovered the wallet, he would certainly return it (with the money); that B has such a character that he might steal it and he might return it; and that C has such a moral character that he would certainly steal it. This paper contains an argument with the following implication: A would deserve greater credit than B for returning the wallet, and C would deserve greater discredit than B for stealing it. Generally speaking, I argue that moral desert is greater for the one who would perform a good act or would perform a bad act than for the one who might do either one. I make use of this point in arguing that moral desert depends on a relation between moral character and action and does not depend upon a free choice.

For more information about the Cal Poly Philosophy Research Workshop Series, continue reading here.

 

Related Content